A federally-registered independent political party

Follow the CEC on Facebook Follow @cecaustralia on Twitter Follow the CEC on Google +

Follow the CEC on Soundcloud

Sky Shields: Kesha Rogers' Victory Launches the Rebirth of a Mars Colonization Policy!
March 8, 2010 • 3:42 PM

by Sky Shields

The recent election victory of Kesha Rogers in Texas's 22nd congressional district represents a turning point in world history. The American voters have demonstrated their refusal to accept the policy of physical-economic austerity which Obama and his controllers have sought to impose through unconstitutional bank bailouts, a murderous health-care policy, and general inaction on the crucial issues of the existential crisis which now faces the American population and the world. Most notably, they have refused to accept Obama's recent, treasonous decision to scrap the last vestiges of our nation's manned presence in space. They have voted, instead, for a future — a future organized around the intensive physical economic progress that can only be brought about by the scientific advancements connected with an expansion of Man's presence in space.

The opportunity created by this victory puts on the table the urgent questions of accomplishing this economic development of the Solar System: the first steps of lunar industrialization, and successfully undertaking a manned mission to Mars. Connected with this mission is the task of finally establishing a very different conception of the organization of the Solar System and beyond. Specifically, the planned presence of human beings in locations very far from the surface of our Earth will require the development a much more in-depth understanding of the action of cosmic and other forms of radiation on and within living systems. Not only will this expanded view of the role of energetic phenomena in living matter make extended stays off-planet possible, it also promises to revolutionize medical technology here on Earth, as well as provide a deeper understanding of the nature of living processes, evolution, and morphogenesis than would ever be possible under the existing policy of atomization and under-funding of such scientific investigations.

One major problem to be tackled will be the question of producing the types of artificial environment required for mankind to leave its "womb" here on Earth. What from the biosphere will we need to carry with us? What will be the role of electromagnetic phenomena and cosmic radiation in that environment? It will perhaps be advisable to simulate Earth's gravitational environment by accelerating ships through inter-planetary space at one Earth gravity (1-G), but this will be the first time such a willful act of constant acceleration has occurred anywhere in the universe. It will represent the first artificial creation of a sustained gravitational field which, if maintained for long periods, will quickly result in relativistic velocities. What will be the effect of this sort of travel on a manned crew? What will be its effect on the physical universe more generally? These questions lead us to further unexplored aspects of the biosphere immediately surrounding us, before leading us deep into man's future in interstellar space.

What is life?

Lyndon LaRouche recently posed a provocative question for our research team here: How do you determine to which of Vernadsky's three phase spaces — the non-living, the living, or the cognitive — a given process belongs? The answer is: Resonance. No object exists independently as an object. All objects are defined by dynamics — by the process in which they exist. Vernadsky states that therefore biology, qua biology, is an abstract science, like geometry, because it artificially seeks to separate the study of the individual organism from the study of the entire process in which it participates. [17] In reality, there are no distinct organisms; there is only the organism in its context in the entire biosphere. This is evidenced by the pervasive role of symbiosis in every aspect of the function and evolutionary development of the biosphere. The evolution of the biosphere is an evolution of relationships, not individual organisms. Therefore, it is more advantageous to consider the biosphere and its evolution as a single system, in which the individual organism exists as a singularity. This nature of the individual organism as singularity and not as object is described in vivid terms by Vernadsky in his concept of the biogenic migration of atoms. [18] Specifically, organisms do not have permanent structures, like machines. Every portion of a living organism is in a constant state of flux, which is expressed as a continuous exchange of matter and energy, such that the distinction between the organism and its outside environment is not a material one. The same material participates in both processes, much the same as the same water flows into and out of a whirlpool. The difference lies in the process, not in the material. The obvious difference in the two cases: between the living organism and the whirlpool, is that upon completing its migration through the processes defined as the organism, the processed matter produced in the form of fossil material exists at a higher state of physical organization than before its participation in the organism.

Thus, viewed as a whole, the envelope of life on Earth, the biosphere, can be viewed as a process of constant organization of the formerly abiotic physical substrate to higher and higher states of organization. In this way we see the steady development of concentrations of various types of ores and other mineral deposits on Earth. These represent a more concentrated form of organization than that which existed in the previously dispersed state of materials as initially derived from stellar matter — a state which is still visible in the relatively homogenous distribution of elements as found in, say, lunar regolith.

This process of biogenic migration represents a continuous process extending well outside of the atmosphere of the Earth itself. For instance: the beginning of the most important material cycles within the biosphere is marked by the action of photosynthesis. In this process, dispersed, low energy-flux-density radiation from the Sun is captured from across large land areas by the action of photosynthetic plants, and organized into the carbohydrate-dense structure of those plants. They literally compose themselves from the incident sunlight which reaches the Earth. These energy-dense carbohydrates are then consumed by more complex animal life and, via the process of digestion, are incorporated into the structure of these higher organisms, ultimately passing back out into the environment in the form of residual biological fossil materials such as soils, mineral deposits, and even Earth's atmosphere. These fossil materials are then again processed by the geological force of human economic activity — becoming noetic fossils. [4, 3, 5, 16] Thus, the biosphere and noösphere can be viewed, in terms of both scale of the space occupied as well as the nature of their activity, as a singularity in an otherwise continuous process, marking the shift of matter and energy to qualitatively higher states of organization and concentration. This continuous process extends to the Sun, in the form of solar energy absorbed by plants (and animals, in the case of vitamin D synthesis), but also much farther, as is evidenced by the steady flow of cosmic radiation into and out of the biosphere. This is a steady flux, much like that of the flow of solar energy into the biosphere, though its role in biological processes is largely unexplored. Understanding the biological role of this steady flow of cosmic material has a crucial significance for an expanded Moon-Mars colonization project.

An example of Vernadsky's concept of the biogenic migration of atoms: Bog iron is produced in several stages by the action of organic life, culminating with the creation of iron oxides by the oxidizing action of iron bacteria.

The biogenic migration of cosmic rays.

This is a complete cycle, like the other biogenic migratory cycles such as food consumption and photosynthesis. There is a steady flow of ionized particles in and out of Earth and its atmosphere. Those among them of the highest energy pass directly through all matter, biological and otherwise, seemingly unaffected by that passage. But it is also these particles, capable of bypassing all types of shielding, which are potentially implicated in regulating the circadian rhythms of various organisms maintained in otherwise shielded environments. [1] Other, lower energy particles are involved in collisions at different levels of the Earth's atmosphere, producing cascades of secondary particles which are involved in changing isotope ratios at the Earth's surface, and likely effecting radical changes in Earth's climate. It is these particles, for instance, which likely play the dominant role in cycles of glaciation, global warming, and the cyclical passage through ice ages. [15, 13]

Artist's image of a cosmic ray striking the Earth's atmosphere, and generating a shower of secondary radiation. The atmosphere is a product of the biosphere, which actively interacts with both cosmic phenomena as well as the magnetic and gravitational fields of the Earth. This interaction generates a steady flux of energized particles, most visible in the form of the auroras, but whose invisible components likely play an important regulatory role in biological and evolutionary processes within the biosphere.

This interaction of cosmic rays with the atmosphere, creating cloud cover and shifting Earth's climate in and out of ice ages, is to be considered a very specific type of interaction with the Earth's biosphere, since, as Vernadsky points out [17], the Earth's atmosphere is entirely a creation of living matter on the planet. Thus, the cascades produced by cosmic radiation upon entering the atmosphere, as well as the highly energetic activity occurring in the ionosphere, interacting with the solar wind and producing phenomena such as the aurora, are all properly recognized as products of the biosphere. The role of cosmic rays on an abiotic environment, such as the Moon, is entirely different, as the peculiar composition of lunar soil attests.

Also, on the level of the individual organism: shielding living creatures from radiation produces a change in metabolic rate similar to the changes in metabolism which result from removing nutrients, warmth, oxygen (in the case of organisms possessing mitochondria) or sunlight (in the case of organisms possessing chloroplasts). This is further indication that cosmic rays play a crucial role in the biogenic migration of material through the biosphere.

The role of cosmic radiation in evolutionary processes. What we know from the fossil record.

Nigel Calder describes a creative role for cosmic rays in the early development of the solar system, fueling chemical reactions, and promoting the formation of complex molecules. [14] Their role in the evolution of matter does not stop with development of the abiotic material in the solar system, however. The most telling example of the role of cosmic radiation in biological processes is its significance in long-term evolutionary cycles. The very fact of the role they play in global warming and glaciation is enough to have a significant effect on biological life on Earth, but there is much evidence for a much more direct role for cosmic ray radiation in evolutionary processes. Most of this connection is recognized only in the form of observed resonances between various cycles in the biosphere, and related cycles elsewhere in interstellar space. Causal connections, and the processes of mediation have not yet been established, though potential candidates will be hypothesized below, starting from the work of Gurwitsch (Gurvich). Besides what we will discuss here, no attempt has yet been made to account for the anti-entropic, creative nature of this entire process, which links life on Earth to the broader cosmos. A comparison of the cycles, which indicates a clear resonance between astronomical, biological, and geological cycles is, however, of great interest for launching the correct investigation.

There have been discovered clear cycles of increase and decrease in fossil biodiversity (the number of distinct species living on the planet at any given moment) of 62 and 140 million years. [12] The 140 million year cycle corresponds to the variations in cosmic ray influx predicted to occur from the Earth's passage through our Galaxy's spiral arms. This predicted, periodic change in incident cosmic radiation has also been verified in examining the changing potassium 40/41 isotope ratios observed in iron meteorites, and thus to the frosty "snowball Earth" periods, which correspond to the quantity of incident cosmic radiation. [13, 15] Examining the age of deposits of igneous rock shows that volcanic activity is on the same roughly 60 million year cycle, showing an as-yet unexplained connection to geological/tectonic phenomena. [12] But, more to our point here, this cycle is also of the same period as that predicted for the regular passage of our Solar system in and out of the plane of the Galaxy, if we take into account the likelihood that the density of cosmic radiation differs from one side of the galactic plane to the other. [9] A component of the Exxon-measured sea level fluctuation is consistent in period and phase with the shorter biodiversity cycle. The ratio of the Strontium 87/86 isotopes, which is related to the amount of dry land left unexposed as water levels change, also matches the period and (inverted) phase of the 62 million year period [9], which again points to a relation between tectonic changes and astronomical cycles [cf. the cycle in volcanic activity identified by Rohde in 12, above]. Thus, in general, we see much evidence for a sort of astrobiogeochemical resonance, which leads us to begin to conceive of the idea of the biosphere as a participant in an organized system whose scale extends to the farthest known sources of cosmic radiation. The impression that astronomical processes are separated by vast reaches of empty space is shown to be incorrect; the biosphere is connected functionally to the farthest reaches of the physical universe by an incredibly active process, invisible to the naked eye. Space is far from empty, but rather full, dynamic, and complex — organizable, like Earth itself, into the interacting phase-spaces of the abiotic, the biosphere, and the noösphere, where the latter indicates the potential for mankind's active economic development and reorganization of this complex system. This is the proper context in which to understand discussions of lunar industrialization, solar system colonization, and the economic organization of interplanetary, interstellar, and intergalactic space.

An image of our solar system's motion around our galaxy. Cosmic radiation is more intense as we pass through the bright areas — the spiral arms, because the matter which produces them is denser there. This correlates to a 140 year cycle of "icehouse" events on Earth, as cosmic radiation interacts with the Earth's atmosphere to increase cloud cover. As it orbits the galaxy's center, however, the solar system also bobs up and down on a cycle of about 60 million years (green line). By Medvedev's model of shock front cosmic ray production, the intensity of cosmic ray production is greater on one side of the galactic disk than on the other. (Medvedev 2007)
Medvedev's illustration of the shock front which ought to be produced due to the face-on motion of our galaxy through the intergalactic medium in the direction of the Virgo cluster. High energy cosmic rays are produced in this shock front, heavily irradiating one side of our galaxy. (Medvedev)
The agreement between so-called "extinction strength" (blue) and the intensity of cosmic rays (red) predicted from Medvedev's model. "Extinction strength" here means the amount of change in fossil biodiversity during each 62 million year cycle of the solar system in and out of the galactic plane. The cosmic ray strength (CR strength) predicted by Medvedev's model differs at each bob due to the irregular distribution of matter throughout our galaxy. The two are a perfect fit. (Medvedev 2006)

This leads us to the major problem with all of these cyclical comparisons, but also potentially the source of the greatest possible number of new lines of research, which is the fact that the actual "chart" of evolutionary development, particularly after the emergence of man and the noösphere, is not cyclical. It is a continuous upward development to ever higher levels of organization and energy-flux-density, as measured and defined by the physical economist Lyndon LaRouche. So now we return to the question posed by LaRouche at the outset: to which of Vernadsky's three phase spaces does this flow of cosmic rays belong? If they and the cycles with which they resonate, are part of the development of the biosphere, then the biosphere's anti-entropic development must be a character of the entire system of material-energetic flows which participate in the development of that biosphere. Connected to this is the necessity of developing means to recognize more qualitative, and not merely quantitative difference in cosmic ray interaction with the biosphere. Life, as we will see below from the work of Gurwitsch, is sensitive to such qualitative differences in electromagnetic and other radiation as the above-mentioned studies have not yet taken into account.

Possible modes of activity within the living organism. What are the natural processes of the living organism that utilize these types of radiation?

Regarding quantity versus quality of radiation, and the sensitivity of life to these qualitative differences (where the current generation of measuring instruments lack equal precision), cf. the work of A. G. Gurwitsch. [6, 7] Life's interaction with, and usage of, coherent electromagnetic radiation is far superior to the types of abiotic phenomena which are frequently attributed to it in theoretical, rather than experimental considerations. Knowledge of the complexity of this normal functioning of different types of radiation within living organisms will shed light on what effects are to be expected from exposure to atypical forms of radiation. Currently, lack of precision in our knowledge of the role of different types of radiation in living phenomena limits us to describing the destructive effects of large amounts or relatively disorganized radiation, such as that which is utilized with varied results in the treatment of various types of cancers. What sort of precision medical applications of radiation could we develop with a more detailed knowledge of the role of radiation in the normal functioning of living processes?

We know of photosynthesis as one clear interaction of living organisms with the electromagnetic spectrum. Likewise, in mammals, we have the sunlight-mediated synthesis of cholecalciferol. Also, however, Gurwitsch and his followers have demonstrated that coherent ultraviolet radiation plays a very important regulatory role in processes of cell mitosis, the most important function in the gestalt properties of the organism: morphogenesis and regulation. [6, 7] Incorrect functioning of this ultraviolet "mitogenetic" radiation has been connected to the development of cancers.

Gurwitsch's famous onion stem experiment, where he demonstrated that processes of cell mitosis, which govern the growth and morphogenesis of the organism, depend on low-intensity ultraviolet radiation, which he termed mitogenetic radiation.

Frank Brown's work, cited above, implies that cosmic rays may play an important role in the regulation of animal metabolisms: The metabolic functions of various organisms are related to various astronomical cycles which tend to be roughly on the order of a day or month. These cycles are reflected in the metabolism of the organism even when the organism is removed from direct visual cues such as the Sun and moon. Frank Brown has shown that this regulation continues when the only influences that have not been isolated are cosmic rays, and the various penetrating electric, magnetic, and gravitational field effects produced by the Earth itself. Many animals are known to possess the ability to orient to the Earth's magnetic field. Birds have recently been demonstrated to navigate by actually visually perceiving the magnetic field of the Earth.

As a final point, connected to the work of Gurwitsch, we know that nucleic acids are extremely sensitive to (resonant with) ultraviolet radiation, to the extent that certain viruses are "turned on/off" (enter and exit their lytic or cancer-inducing phase), based on interaction with ultraviolet radiation in laboratory conditions.

What we know about the sources of these fluxes. Crab nebula, pulsars, super/hypernovae.

Our first indication of the fundamentally creative nature of even the "abiotic" universe, is to be found in our recognition of its character as a dynamic, developing system, constantly coming into creation. Relevant to our topic of discussion here, is the constant creation of new sources of cosmic radiation in the form of supernovae, hypernovae, pulsar stars, and the like. While most of what is claimed about them at present is pure speculation, simply extrapolated from existing physical knowledge here on Earth, what is clear is that their constant rate of creation gives us a sense of a moving, directed rather than cyclical, process which more closely resembles that which characterizes the development of the biosphere and the noösphere, each in their respective degree. Therefore, understanding their resonance with life on Earth will give us more insight into these as-yet unexplored creative characteristics of theirs.

A major source of cosmic radiation entering Earth's biosphere: The mysterious Crab Nebula, whose properties are still almost completely unexplained, despite the existence of many attempts at physical theories. It has characteristics which challenge the existing understanding of the theory of relativity, and which reflect the gestalt qualities which Max Planck and his student Wolfgang Köhler recognized as reflecting quantum phenomena. It is shown here as a false-color, composite image, utilizing data from the Hubble, Chandra, and Spitzer space telescopes, reflecting the different types of electromagnetic radiation produced.

A 1-G trip to Mars will represent Man's creation of new relativistic phenomena. It is significant that the known, major sources of cosmic radiation here on Earth, such as the Crab Nebula, are all connected to phenomena which seem paradoxical from the standpoint of relativity theory. This points to a type of causality which lies outside of the simple, kinematic chains of cause and effect, and leads us towards a more gestalt, systems approach to causality: dynamics. A more certain assessment of the nature of these processes demands a closer inspection, and raises the question: What physical boundaries do we begin to push at the moment we institute trips at an acceleration of one Earth gravity over long distances?

Experimental proposals.

The first experimental investigations will obviously require a more detailed study of the environment to be faced by our interplanetary travelers. Probes carrying several different types of instrumentation will need to be accelerated at 1-G for an extended period of time, in order to gauge what unexpected physical effects might result from this process.

· · ·

The economic questions connected to this expanded investigation is more than a question of "local jobs." What this type of political orientation means, and what Kesha and LaRouche represent, is an orientation towards the future of the human species as a whole. Ensuring mankind's future in this form is the only way to ensure the existence of healthcare, real meaningful employment, and a cultural sense of mission for not only this nation, but the world. Real patriots, policy makers, scientists, engineers, and average citizens will rally around the vision that this mission represents, defeat the financial controllers of the current Obama administration, and help Kesha make this policy a reality. In a world desperate for real leadership, the future, and our survival, is in our hands.

contact: sky.jason.shields@gmail.com


(1) Brown, F. Living Clocks. Science 130 (1959)

(2) Brown, F. An Exogenous Reference-Clock for Persistent, Temperature-Independent, Labile, Biological Rhythms. Biological Bulletin 115 (1958)

(3) LaRouche, Lyndon H. "The Economics of the Noosphere" EIR News Services, Inc. (2001)

(4) LaRouche, Lyndon H. Vernadsky and Dirichlet's Principle. 21st Century Science and Technology (2005)

(5) LaRouche, Lyndon H. The_Astrophysics_of_Gurwitsch_Radiation_LHL_Fall_1998.pdfThe Astrophysics of Gurwitsch Radiation. 21st Century Science and Technology (Fall 1998)

(6) Lipkind, M. Gurwitsch_and_the_Biological_Field_I_Lipkin_Summer_1998.pdfAlexander Gurwitsch and the Concept of the Biological Field, Part 1. 21st Century Science and Technology (Summer 1998)

(7) Lipkind, M. Gurwitsch_and_the_Biological_Field_II_Lipkin_Fall_1998.pdfAlexander Gurwitsch and the Concept of the Biological Field, Part 2. 21st Century Science and Technology (Fall 1998)

(8) Lowry, Colin. Gurwitsch's Non-Reductionist Biology. 21st Century Science and Technology (Fall 1998)

(9) Medvedev, Mikhail V. & Melott, Adrian L. Do Extragalactic Cosmic Rays Induce Cycles in Fossil Diversity? The Astrophysical Journal (2007)

(10) Melott, Adrian L. & Bambach, Richard K. An ubiquitous ~62 Myr periodic fluctuation superimposed on general trends in fossil biodiversity: Parts I and II

(11) Presman, A. S. "Electromagnetic Fields and Life" Plenum Press (1970)

(12) Rohde, Robert A. & Muller, Richard A. Cycles in fossil diversity. Nature 434 (2005)

(13) Shaviv, N. Cosmic ray diffusion from the galactic spiral arms, iron meteorites, and a possible climactic connection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002)

(14) Svensmark, H & Calder, N. "The Chilling Stars: A New Theory of Climate Change" Totem Books (2008)

(15) Svensmark, H. Cosmoclimatology: A New Theory Emerges. A&G 48 (2007)

(16) Vernadsky, Vladimir I. Some Words About the Noosphere. 21st Century Science and Technology. (2005)

(17) Vernadsky, Vladimir I. "The Biosphere" Springer. (1998)

(18) Vernadsky, Vladimir I. "Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon" Nongovernmental Ecological V.I. Vernadsky Fndtn (1997)

Citizens Electoral Council © 2016
Best viewed at 1024x768.
Please provide technical feedback to webadmin@cecaust.com.au
All electoral content is authorised by National Secretary, Craig Isherwood, 595 Sydney Rd, Coburg VIC 3058.